IFGH 2012: University Community Partnership Project: Community Selection Criteria and Readiness Assessment

Posted by Irish Forum for Global Health | Conference Abstracts

Authors:Elmusharaf K.1’2, Abu-Sinn D.1, Khalid A.1, Victor F.1, Abel-Hamid A.1, Abuagla A.1, Khalil A.1, Mohammed A.3

Author Affiliations:1 Reproductive & Child Health Research Unit (RCRU), at University of Medical Sciences & Technology (Khartoum – Sudan), 2 Connecting Health Research in Africa and Ireland Consortium (CHRAIC), National University of Ireland Galway, 3University of Kassala, Sudan

Option 2- Lessons from the field; project and programme evaluations; and syntheses or analyses Presented as – Oral Presentation

Issue:

Many factors account for the success of University - Community partnerships for heath in post conflict settings. Many of these partnerships neither consider criteria to select the community to partner with nor assess the readiness to implement the appropriate interventions.

Description:

Community Selection Criteria and Scoring System (CSCSS) was created and then applied to select a post conflict village to partner with in Kassel State in East Sudan through desk review, key informant interviews and observation. Readiness, Ability and Willingness Assessment (RAWA) of shortlisted communities to partner with our Universities were assessed as part of the second phase of community selection.

The criteria included key factors such as population size, socioeconomic status, population movement, previous exposure to community programs and external funding, and auxiliary factors such as literacy level, health status, health facilities, transport facilities, education facilities, utilities- tap-water and electricity. Some of the factors considered for RAWA assessment were health awareness, existing community efforts and recognition of these efforts, available resources, community climate and attitude, community leadership, community mobilization for health, and training of community workers.

Outcome:

As a result of this exercise Makali village was selected and a partnership was created in July 2011 as a University Community Partnership Project (UCPP) between the village, University of Medical Sciences & Technology and University of Kassala to work in equal partnership to promote the health status, work on determinants of health, enhance the level of readiness and empowerment aiming eventually to create an independent community.

Conclusion:

To choose a single village from several communities for partnership or community based initiative can be challenging. The CSCSS and RAWA provided a systematic approach to select an appropriate community for UCPP, acted as an advocacy approach and facilitated the identification of relevant stakeholders.

Keywords: advocacy community HRH partnerships public-private partnerships

| Comments | 29 Jan 2012

About the author

You might also like...

• IFGH 2012: Economically Sustainable High Quality Career Paths for African Eye Care Workers (30 Jan 2012)
• IFGH 2012: An Evaluation of the Relevance, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact and Sustainability of the Community-led Total Sanitation (CLTS) Approach in Liberia (29 Jan 2012)
• IFGH 2012: Public Health Advocacy in Low Income Settings: Views and Experiences on Effective Strategies and Evaluation of Health Advocates in Malawi (29 Jan 2012)
• IFGH 2012: Novel Approach for North-South Partnerships for Training & Capacity-Building Utilizing an Electronic Health Library (E-HL) (31 Jan 2012)
• IFGH 2012: 'From Dream to Reality' the National HRH observatory- Sudan Success story (31 Jan 2012)
• IFGH 2012: Support, Train and Empower Managers (STEM) (30 Jan 2012)
• IFGH 2012: The Quagmire of Task Shifting for Service Quality and Coverage: Preliminary Findings from 2 Districts of Malawi (30 Jan 2012)

Comments